Europe In Bible Prophecy
Introduction
Dr. David R. Reagan
The most important prophetic development of the 20th
Century was the regathering of the Jewish people to
their historic homeland in the Middle East, resulting in
the creation of the state of Israel on May 14, 1948. The
second most important development was the formation of a
European confederation known as The European Union. Both
of these momentous historical events point to the fact
that we are living in the end times, right on the
threshold of the Tribulation and the Lord’s return.
The Council of the Union is the chief
legislative body. It is headquartered in Brussels,
Belgium, and consists of 87 representatives appointed by
the member states. Some decisions require a unanimous
vote; most require a “qualified majority” of 62 votes.
The voting is weighted in relation to the size of the
countries.
The Parliament of the Union consists of 626
members who are directly elected for five year
terms. The Parliament is a parliament in name
only. It is primarily a public forum whose members sit
in blocs organized according to political views rather
than nationalities. It has been growing in power in
recent years. The Parliament holds its committee
meetings at a facility in Brussels. Its plenary sessions
are conducted at its elaborate new headquarters in
Strasbourg, France. Although it has recently gained some
“co-decision” power, its influence is felt primarily
through its discussions and resolutions.
The Commission of the Union is the agency
responsible for implementing legislation. It is the
executive branch. There are 20 Commissioners — two each
from France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Britain, and one
from each of the other member states. They are appointed
for five year terms. The Commission President is the
chief executive officer of The European Union. Romano
Prodi of Italy currently holds this position.
The Court of Justice has its headquarters in
Luxembourg. There are 15 justices, one from each member
state, appointed for terms of six years. Judgements of
the Court in the field of EU law are binding on all
members states, their national courts, their companies,
and their private citizens. The decisions override those
of national courts.
The Central Bank is located in Frankfurt,
Germany and is responsible for monetary policy and the
new Euro currency which was introduced in January 1999
and which will replace the member states national
currencies in 2002.
Revenue for the Union in 2000 came to $93.2
billion. The largest source of income was the 1.27% of
Gross National Income that each member state is required
to pay. In 2000 this levy produced 47.8% of the
Union’s revenue. The next highest source (36.4%) came
from a 1% VAT tax (value-added-tax) on goods and
services. The rest of the income came from an assortment
of agricultural levies and custom duties.
Emergence of a Super-State
The European Union is poised for a major expansion.
In March 1998 the EU opened talks on full membership
with six countries — Cyprus, the Czech Republic,
Estonia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovenia. In October 1999
the Commission proposed talks with another six —
Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Romania, and
Slovakia. When these countries are added, nearly all the
people of Europe will be joined in a single Union by
free and democratic consent for the first time in
history.
The movement for European unity which was launched in
1950 by Robert Schuman and Jean Monet (see the side bar
on page 3) has gradually evolved into a super-state. An
official publication of the Union states: “The EU system
is inherently evolutionary. It was designed to allow for
the gradual development of European unification and has
not yet achieved its final form.”1
|
Key Steps in the
Development of the European Union
May 9,
1950 The Schuman Declaration
French Foreign Minister, Robert Schuman
announces a plan conceived by French businessman
Jean Monet to pool European coal and steel
production under a common authority. The result
was the creation of the European Coal and Steel
Community (ECSC) in 1951 consisting of France,
Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium, and
Luxembourg.
March 25,
1957 The Treaty of Rome
The six ECSC member states agree to set
up a common market called The European Economic
Community (EEC) which went into effect in
January 1958.
January 1,
1973 First Expansion of the
Community
Three nations are added to the community
— Denmark, Ireland, and Britain. Later additions
include Greece (1981), Spain and Portugal
(1986), and Austria, Finland, and Sweden
(1995).
June 7-10,
1979 First Elections
Members of the European Parliament are
directly elected for the first time. Previously
the parliaments of the member nations had
appointed the representatives.
February 7,
1992 Maastricht Treaty
This treaty transforms the EEC from a
strictly economic union to one that is both
economic and political, creating the European
Union in
1993. | | |
The European Union now manifests three of the most
important characteristics of a state. It has a unified
economic system, an integrated political structure, and
a shared vision for the future. Prophecy teacher Jimmy
DeYoung points out that it even has a common language —
namely, English.2 Although many languages are
spoken by the member nations and their representatives,
almost all know English because the Internet has made it
the common trade language.
What the Union officially lacks is a military force.
But it is in the making. A military staff has been
assembled, with a commander-in-chief, and it currently
has at its disposal 60,000 front line troops on standby,
with 400 assault aircraft and up to 80
warships.3 The British government refers to
it as a “Rapid Reaction Force.” That is nothing but a
euphemism for an army. It has been dubbed “Eurocorps” by
the rest of Europe, and it is supposed to be ready for
action in 2003. The British are downplaying this
military arm of the Union because they want to continue
their partnership with the United States in NATO. The
French would like to see the Eurocorps replace NATO, as
it probably will.
Relating the EU to Bible Prophecy
Kenneth
Humphries
(Note: Kenneth Humphries is a Baptist
pastor in Northern Ireland. He serves on the board of
the Irish Baptist College and is chairman of the
Prophetic Witness Movement International (Ireland). He
can be contacted over the Internet at
kennethhumphries@hotmail.com)
An often asked question these days as I travel from
place to place preaching the prophetic message is, “Does
Europe really have a role in biblical prophecy?” The
answer to this question is an emphatic, “Yes!” In fact,
the role of a unified Europe in end time prophecy is
much clearer in the Bible than the role of the world’s
only current super power — the United States. The book
of Daniel establishes with certainty that a unified
Europe will rise in the end times out of the ashes of
the old Roman Empire.
Throughout the centuries since Rome fell, many
political leaders have dreamed of resurrecting the Roman
Empire. Napoleon Bonaparte, Benito Mussolini, Adolf
Hitler, and Winston Churchill, for different reasons and
with differing motives, all shared the vision of a
United States of Europe. But that vision had to await
God’s timing for its fulfillment. That timing came at
the end of World War II.
Factors Contributing to Union
Most of Europe was completely devastated by the war.
That devastation prompted various nations in Western
Europe to put aside their age-old hatreds and jealousies
in order to reach out to each other for mutual support
and aid. The result was a series of economic unions
which helped to spur the European economy.
The collapse of Communism throughout Eastern Europe
in the late 1980's and the early 1990's removed the
biggest remaining barrier to European union. Germany was
reunited and all of Eastern Europe was liberated to seek
its own destiny. That destiny has proved to be an
expanding European union.
When the Treaty on European Union, signed in
Maastricht (the Netherlands) on February 7, 1992, came
into force on November 1, 1993, it gave European
integration a whole new dimension. The European
Community, which was essentially economic in aspiration
and content, was transformed into a full-fledged
political entity known as The European Union.
The European Attitude
The significance of this new political union in the
European mind is well stated in an official publication
of the European Union:
The building of a united Europe is undoubtedly one
of the greatest historical undertakings of the 20th
Century. It is a process grounded in the positive
values with which our civilization identifies — the
preservation of peace, economic and social progress,
respect for the person, and the predominance of right
over might . .
Six countries originally rallied to the concept of
a united Europe, now there are fifteen, while more
than ten others feel drawn towards that ideal and have
applied to join the European Union.
The 20th Century bears tragic
scars left by the rise and then the collapse of the
totalitarian ideologies. As the third millennium
dawns, the movement towards a voluntary union among
Europe’s peoples is . . . clearly the only credible
answer to the hazards and opportunities posed by the
increasing globalization of the world
economy. 1
The foremost symbol of this new European
confederation is the Euro, a common currency that all
members of the European Union are supposed to start
using in place of their national currencies on January
1, 2002. The announcement of an agreement on the Euro
was greeted in some quarters with an enthusiasm that
bordered on blasphemy. Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio
Guterres raved: “As Peter was the rock on which the
church was built, so the Euro is the rock on which the
European Union will be built.”2
The Biblical Significance
The biblical significance of these momentous
developments in Europe has been widely recognized by
students of Bible prophecy. For example, commenting on
the signs of the times that point to the Lord’s soon
return, Dr. S. Franklin Logsdon wrote:
The present statehood of Israel is
a powerful indication of the ending of the age. The
Ecumenical Movement is another. Perhaps equal to
either of these is the European Common Market with its
many implications . . . it is an economic community, a
breaking down of national barriers, a getting together
on certain common bases. The whole idea is to reshape
the face of Europe. This was attempted by Caesar, by
Napoleon, and by Hitler, but their means to this end
were not subtle or as workable as those proposed
by the Common Market. They used ammunition; today’s
promoters use bread. And let it be said that the
reshaping of the face of Europe approximates the
kingdom to arise out of the old Roman Empire — the
last Gentile power. 3
Those words were written in 1973, long before the
European Economic Community had evolved into the much
stronger and more significant European Union of
1993.
The question is, can we find this newly emerging
power bloc in Scripture? Yes, I believe we can. Chapters
2 and 7 of Daniel is where the European sign is
revealed. We are told that the prophecies given to
Daniel in these chapters relate to “the latter days”
(2:28), “to what would take place in the future” (2:29).
Daniel’s prophecies are based upon a dream which God
gave to Nebuchadnezzar (2:31-35). Interpreting that
dream, Daniel concluded that it revealed a succession of
Gentile empires, beginning with the Babylonian Empire,
followed by Medo-Persia, Greece and Rome (2:36-40).
The last Gentile world empire will be a confederation
of nations (2:41-43) that will arise out of the old
Roman Empire (7:7-8). And out of that confederation, the
Antichrist will arise, using the revived Roman Empire as
his base to conquer the world (7:8, 23-25). But this
final Gentile empire will be short-lived, for it will be
suddenly crushed by the return of the Messiah who will
“set up a kingdom which will never be destroyed”
(2:44).
The Practical Meaning
I believe that today, before our very eyes, we are
witnessing the fulfillment of these ancient prophecies
of Daniel. Europe has reunited into a revived Roman
Empire that is expanding rapidly in size. As it grows,
and as national identities are de-emphasized, it will
most likely be divided into ten administrative areas,
just as Daniel prophesied (2:42-44 and 7:7 — the ten
toes of chapter 2 correspond to the ten horns of chapter
7).
What does all this mean for you and me? If what we
are seeing on the European scene just now is indeed what
God has prophesied — and I, for one, am without doubt it
is so — then we are on the threshold of the Lord’s
return. Are you ready for such an event? If not, then do
you know what to do? There is only one way to get ready
and that is to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and be
saved! If you are saved, then pray for the salvation of
your family members and your friends and neighbors. And
then witness Jesus to them. Don’t let those you love and
care about go to an awful Hell.
The New Unholy Roman Empire
Alan
Franklin
(Note: Alan Franklin has been a
journalist for 37 years. He currently serves as editor
of a newspaper in southern England. Alan is a Bible
prophecy teacher and expert on the cults. He can be
contacted at alan.franklin@ntlworld.com)
I have been a journalist since 1964, spending ten
years as a chief reporter and the last 17 as the editor
of a journal serving a quarter of a million readers in
southeast England in the London area. As a Christian
versed in prophecy I cannot help but see in the emerging
European superstate the foundations of a one world
government with a one world dictator at its head — the
man whose Biblical names include “the Beast,” “the man
of sin” and “the Antichrist.”
In fact, leaders in Europe are already calling for a
strong leader, saying that committees do not work and
they need more inspired leadership. German Foreign
Minister Joschka Fischer repeated his call for a
European government in July, 2000, and said the European
single currency — the Euro— was “the first step to a
federation.” He added that he wanted a “powerful
president.”1
Fischer said his aim was “nothing less than a
European parliament and a European government, which
really do exercise legal and executive power,” to
operate under his powerful president. More sinisterly,
he welcomed the progress made in removing the “sovereign
rights” of nations which he defined as control of
currency and control of internal and external security.
In summary, Fischer said, “Political union is the
challenge for this generation.”2
The Desire for a Superstate
I was invited to Brussels, where the European
Parliament is situated, in my role as publisher of a
business newspaper. I watched the vote taken as eleven
countries abandoned their own currencies to form a
united Eurozone with the euro replacing everything from
the lira of Italy to the Irish pound. They were
effectively voting for the abolition of the nation
state, and it was astonishing to see with what little
formality or protest countries like France and Germany
gave up control of their financial and economic destiny
to join in the project to create “a common European
home,” as the founding fathers of the European Union put
it. No mention was made of the crippling cost to nations
of scrapping their currencies.
After the vote I went to lunch with six MEPS —
Members of the European Parliament — of different
political parties. We talked about the future and I said
that, as they now had one parliament and one currency,
they were in many senses effectively one country. They
could not really disagree, as the EU has all the
trappings of a state, even its own embryonic army — the
planned 60,000 rapid-reaction Eurocorps. So I asked:
“Have any of you thought about the next step?” They
asked me what I meant. So I explained that, with one
currency and one parliament, the next big step was to
have one leader or one fuhrer, (one Antichrist!). After
all, it was Hitler who was the last leader who tried to
unify Europe under one Government with one currency.
The Desire for a Superman
That many in Europe have been thinking on these lines
for years is shown in a chilling quote from Paul-Henri
Spaak, former Belgian Prime Minister and President of
the Consultative Assembly of the Council of Europe
nearly 50 years ago. He said : “We do not want another
committee. We have too many already. What we want is a
man of sufficient stature to hold the allegiance of all
people, and to lift us out of the economic morass in
which we are sinking. Send us such a man and, be he God
or the devil, we will receive him.”3
More recently Jack Lang, then president of the French
National Assembly’s foreign affairs committee, said that
the EU “needs a single figure at the helm.” Attacking
the inertia in European foreign policy, he said Europe
needed a strong central government with a single
“personality” in control.4 Students of Bible
prophecy will have little doubt who this “personality”
will be.
A Global Vision
The present format of the EU cannot last, and it was
never intended that it should. Right from the beginning,
the founders had grand, globalist ambitions. Addressing
the European Policy Centre in September, 2000, Belgian
Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt described the
subterfuge adopted to set up the embryonic EU. “With the
European Coal and Steel Community, the seeds were sown
of the European Union of today. It was the initial
impetus to the development of a community approach, step
by step forging European integration by joining, and
sometimes also by abolishing, national sovereignty into
a joint approach.”5
Turning to the next great leap forward, Verhofstadt
said: “It is of the utmost importance to keep in mind a
global vision of the ultimate goal of European
unification.” This is a good thing, he explained,
because “the European Union as it is now could
never be the ultimate goal.” He said the pace of
integration must never slacken lest, “in the worst case,
countries will start to plead for the restoration of
their former sovereignty.”6 Notice that
national sovereignty — independence — is referred to in
the past tense.
Underlying Values
Next came the real bombshell. The Belgian said that
there must be values underpinning this vast undertaking
— the largest coming together of countries in the
history of the world. But whose values? His answer: “the
values which resulted from the French
Revolution.”7 So, the values of the brave new
Europe are to be those of the country which gave us the
guillotine, the reign of terror and the time of blood
washing through the streets of France!
“The Portman Papers,” a quarterly newsletter keeping
watch on developments in the superstate, says in its
October 2000 edition: “Verhofstadt’s values come from
this. Eight years before the French Revolution began in
1789 with the Declaration of The Rights of Man, the
General Council of Freemasonry at Wilhelmsbad, convened
by Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminati, drew up
the blueprint. Its evil spirit was epitomized in
Maximilian Robespierre, whose technique of terror
anticipated Stalin’s by 100 years.”8
The French Reign of Terror claimed over a million
victims. Inmates of prisons were slaughtered. Human
heads were counted up like scores on cards. The terror
was justified in the name of “democracy.” Similarly the
coming clampdown on free speech, religious freedom and
free political parties by the “beast of Brussels” system
is being justified by words like “anti-discrimination”
and a “charter of rights.”
Other Influences
What is emerging in Europe is a new Holy European
Empire, an attempt to resurrect the old Holy Roman
Empire that existed under the Pope. This is becoming
increasingly blatant. The Vatican is playing a
major role in the creation of the new European Empire,
and Catholic social values — so-called “Christian
Socialism” — are at its heart. The present Pope has
repeatedly called for religious unity in Europe. This
means a united, Catholic Europe, which was consecrated
to Mary by the Vatican in 1309.
When I visited Strasbourg, the French city near the
German border which, with Brussels, co-hosts the
European Parliament, I was introduced to the head of the
house of Habsburg, Otto von Habsburg, a man whose family
dominated Europe for centuries. Full of charm and
intelligence, he said that instead of war, a great new
Europe could be built on peaceful cooperation. His ideas
go far beyond this, however. In his book, The Social
Order of Tomorrow, he writes:
Now we do possess a European symbol which belongs to
all nations equally. This is the crown of the Holy Roman
Empire, which embodies the tradition of Charlemagne, the
ruler of a united occident . . . the Crown represents
not merely the sovereignty of the monarch, but also the
ties between authority and the people. True, it is the
monarch who is crowned, but in this sacred act he
appears as the representative of the whole people. It
should therefore be considered whether the European head
of state, as the protector of European law and justice,
should not also become the guardian of a symbol which,
more than any other, represents the sovereignty of the
European community.9
Dr. Habsburg wants to see Europe have an elected head
of state — a man elected for life. This influence of
both Charlemagne and the Habsburgs hangs heavily over
the new federal Europe. The crown of Charlemagne,
the first person to attempt to revive the Roman Empire
in 800 AD, is an inspiration to those who promote the
breaking down of nation states, and a Charlemagne prize
has been established for those who work hardest for
European unity. One who did was ex-President Clinton,
who in June 2000, was the first American president to
receive the Charlemagne prize for his work in promoting
European unity. He received the prize at the cathedral
in Aachen, Germany, where the first Holy Roman Emperor
lies buried. Clinton called for an enlargement of the EU
to even take in Russia.
America and the EU
In a report in The Daily Telegraph, President
Clinton said the European Union should have at
least 30 member states, including all the nations of the
Balkans, Turkey and possibly even Russia. He said that
European peace and prosperity now depended on the EU
setting its boundaries ever wider. The report stated
that Mr. Clinton was determined to be viewed as “part of
a family of statesmen associated with European
integration.”10 He held private talks with
Helmut Kohl, the former German Chancellor, in Berlin.
Although Mr. Kohl has been discredited by a party
funding scandal inside the Christian Democrat Union
party, he is still regarded as the most important force
behind European integration in the past 30 years. It is
easy to see how these two suspect “statesmen” have much
in common, but it is difficult to see how the
establishment of a major, often anti-American power
block in Europe could be in America’s interests, and
thus it is surprising that it has been American policy
to push for greater unification of Europe.
Perhaps America’s fine new President is the man to
see the folly of this.
Religious Symbols of the European
Union
Alan
Franklin
The Bible teaches that the Revived Roman Empire of
the end times will be a creation of Satan, and out of it
will come his representative, the Antichrist. The fact
that the formation of the European Union has major
spiritual implications is reflected in the religious
symbols that the Union has adopted in the form of its
flag, its anthem, its architecture, and its basic
logo.
The Madonna
The European Union’s flag consists of 12 stars,
inspired by the halo of 12 stars that appear around the
Madonna in Catholic pictures of her. A former secretary
general of the Council of Europe, Leon Marchal, affirmed
that the stars are those of “the woman of the
Apocalypse.” Enthusiastically he explained, “It’s
wonderful that we have gotten back to the Introit of the
new Mass of the Assumption. It’s the corona stellarum
duodecim (the crown of the twelve stars) of the woman of
the Apocalypse.”1 This is a reference to the
woman in Revelation 12 who appears with a crown of 12
stars. Although this woman represents Israel, the
Catholic Church has always claimed that she represents
the virgin Mary, “the mother of God.”
The EU, which now has 15 member countries, has
confirmed that the number of stars will always stay at
12, which indicates that the stars do not represent
countries. I quote from a leaflet, “Building Europe
Together,” which I was given on a visit to EU
headquarters in Brussels: “The European flag (is) a
shared flag, blue with 12 gold stars symbolizing
completeness. The number will remain 12 no matter how
many countries there are in the European
Union.”2
The Anthem
The same document, issued to commemorate “Europe Day,
May 9,” also touts Europe’s new common anthem, “Ode
To Joy,” the prelude to the last movement of
Beethoven’s ninth symphony. The EU document states that
although the anthem officially is the “Ode To Joy,” it
really is an “ode to freedom — to a sense of
community and to peace between the 15 countries which
have decided to unite and to others which will freely
decide to join them.”
In fact the “Ode To Joy” is not quite that innocent.
The lyrics, by a man named Friedrich von Schiller,
concern the entering of the shrine of a pagan goddess
and the uniting of all men in brotherhood, by the power
of magic.3
The Tower of Babel
An amazing poster was issued by the European Union,
showing the Tower of Babel and carrying the slogan:
“Many tongues, one voice.” In case the point was lost, a
crane in the background was shown rebuilding the tower.
Above the Tower of Babel were shown the eurostars, but
inverted, as in witchcraft, with the central points
downwards.
The story of the rise and fall of Babylon told in
Genesis chapter eleven should have been a warning to all
men for all time. Nimrod and his followers tried to
build a tower to reach the heavens, but it was the
counterfeit building of a counterfeit religion.
Mystical Babylon is now being rebuilt in Europe, and
those who would follow Nimrod have now succeeded in
building a parliament building in Strasbourg, France,
whose centerpiece is an enormous replica of the
unfinished tower of Babel. Even the secular press could
not miss the connection between the old and new towers
of Babel. They labeled the new French structure “The
Tower of Eurobabel.” This monumental building, full
of labyrinthine corridors, is used only one week in
four, because the rest of the time the EU Parliament
meets in committees in Brussels. Every three weeks the
whole caboodle shuffles between the two sites in a fleet
of 200 trucks, at enormous expense. An MEP I know was
there on the day Eurobabel opened and reported total
chaos in the £300 million structure, commenting: “If
they can’t run a building, should we trust them with a
continent?”
Nigel Farage is a member of the European Parliament
who belongs to the United Kingdom Independence Party,
which is fighting to get Britain out of the superstate.
He said in an article just after the opening day: “We
realize we are not merely entering a building, but being
allowed access to the temple of a bold new
empire.”4
The Woman Riding a Beast
Another demonic biblical symbol that is being used in
conjunction with the European Union is the one from
Revelation 17 where a “great harlot” is depicted riding
a beast. For some strange and unknown reason this symbol
is being used to represent the EU! For example,
when Britain issued a stamp to commemorate the first
European Parliament elections in 1979, the picture on
the stamp depicted a woman riding a beast.
According to the Rev. Dr. Ian Paisley, a Northern
Ireland Protestant minister and member of the European
Parliament, the woman on a beast is now the official
picture of the EU. He points out that the multi-million
dollar new parliament building in Brussels, Belgium,
contains a dome with a colossal painting, three times
life size, of a woman riding a beast.
In Strasbourg, France, the rival parliamentary
building (the one with the Tower of Babel) features a
mural of a naked woman riding a beast. Likewise, the new
Brussels headquarters of the Council of Europe contains
a bronze statue of a woman riding a beast, and the beast
is depicted riding on waves, just as in Revelation 17.
Scripture is being fulfilled before our eyes, for
those with eyes to see.
Notes Related to the EU Articles
Introduction
1) “The European Union: A Guide for
Americans,” published by the Delegation of the European
Commission in the United States, Washington, D.C.,
October 1999, p. 7. This is an excellent booklet, and it
can be obtained free of charge by writing The Delegation
of The European Commission, 2300 M Street, NW,
Washington, D.C. 20037. Or, you can order it from the
Delegation’s website at www.eurunion.org.
2) Jimmy DeYoung, “Europe, NATO and the
Antichrist,” Israel My Glory, March/April 2001, p.
19.
3) EU: Final World Empire, a video
program by Alan Franklin and Tony Pearce produced by
Hearthstone and distributed in the United States by
Southwest Radio Church in Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma.
Relating the EU to Bible
Prophecy
1) Pascal Fontaine, “Seven Key Days in
the Making of Europe,” an article posted on the Internet
website of Europa: The European Union On-Line, located
at http://europe.eu.int/index_en.htm#.
2) Van Impe Intelligence Briefing,
February, 1996, available on the Internet at
www.jvim.com.
3) S. Franklin Logsdon, Profiles of
Prophecy, (Michigan: Zondervan Publishers, 1973), p.
119.
The New Unholy Roman
Empire
1) “German Foreign Minister floats idea
of elected EU president,” The Financial Times, July 7,
2000. This article was a report on a speech by Joschka
Fischer to the European Parliament’s constitutional
affairs committee.
2) Ibid.
3) This is a frequently quoted remark
attributed to Paul-Henri Spaak. However, its original
source is uncertain.
4) The London Times, August 19, 1997,
quoting a speech by Jack Lang which he gave in
Paris.
5) Speech by Guy Verhofstadt at the
European Policy Centre on September 21,
2000.
6) Ibid.
7) Ibid.
8) The Portman Papers, October 2000.
This is a quarterly newsletter concerning developments
within the EU.
9) Otto von Habsburg, The Social Order
of Tomorrow, Newman Press, 1959.
10) “EU must embrace Russia, says
Clinton,” by Toby Helm, The Daily Telegraph (of London),
June 3, 2000, page 12.
Religious Symbols of the European
Union
1) Remarks of Leon Marchal were reported
by Dr. William Crampton, executive director of The
Flag Institute in York, England. The remarks were made
in 1973.
2) Building Europe Together, a pamphlet
published by the European Union, Brussels, Belgium,
1997.
3) Adrian Hilton, The Principality and
Power of Europe, Dorchester House Publications, England,
1997, second edition in 2000. A copy of Schiller’s
mystical words for “Ode to Joy” can be found on the
Internet at www.ddc.net/ygg/etext/ode.htm.
4) Article by Nigel Farage in The Daily
Mail (London), July 24,
1999.
Original article: Lamb & Lion Ministries
Fair Use Notice
BACK
|