A borderless world! Social solidarity! Economic equality! Housing and health for all! The feel-good togetherness of serving the greater whole.... The list of utopian promises stretches the imagination. How can this dream be fulfilled? What will it cost? Why is migration vital to this process? How free is our president to block this transformational plan? This dream of a New World Order was born long before socialist visionaries (including Franklin Roosevelt and the leaders of the Federal Council of Churches) enthroned Communist Alger Hiss as the first head of the United Nations.[3] [See The Revolutionary Roots of the UN] Hiss was the primary author of The UN Charter, which summarized its vision in noble terms that few could criticize. "WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS," it began,
It took the Second World War to make the new system acceptable to the people. In the wake of that useful crisis, the masses willingly embraced the UN promise of "economic and social advancement of all" under the guiding hand of the new "international machinery." In the decades that followed, most people seemed to dismiss UN treaties and declarations as "soft laws" and policies with little effect on national sovereignty. They didn't know the many ways UN declarations would permeate national laws and policies. [See Trading U.S. Rights for UN Rules] The mainstream media didn't tell us. So when the The Global Commission on International Migration was launched by the United Nations Secretary-General and a number of governments on December 9, 2003, few saw the red lights.[5] But America is awakening. An immigrant-friendly nation, it has welcomed grateful immigrants from around the world into its system. Now, it faces something something new. The word immigration implies people moving across a national border into another country. In contrast, migration simply means people moving. No border! It supports the vision of a borderless global society, and it intentionally clashes with national sovereignty, laws and independence. Thomas Sowell summarizes some of its current problems:
This legalized lawlessness fuels the "crisis" needed to persuade the masses to accept mass surveillance, universal data collection, and other intrusive strategies for worldwide control. And it gets worse: "Based on a one-year in-depth study, a researcher estimates there are about 240,000 illegal immigrant sex offenders in the United States who have had an average of four victims each."[7]
"The immigration reform bill now under congressional consideration would grant amnesty to some 10 million illegal immigrants.... CIRA would transform the United States socially, economically and politically. Within two decades, the character of the nation would differ dramatically from what exists today."[8]
"When Sept. 11 hijackers Hani Hanjour and Khalid Almihdhar needed help getting fraudulent government-issued photo IDs before embarking on their suicide mission, they hopped into a van and headed to the parking lot of a 7-Eleven store in Falls Church, Va. That's where scores of illegal alien day laborers ply bogus identity documents to other illegal aliens from around the world.... Nearly five years later, illegal alien day laborers like the ones who unwittingly assisted the 9/11 hijackers have virtually no fear of being arrested."[9] A web
of secrecy and a flood of misleading propaganda hides the truth from taxpayers
who cover the costs. For example, the title of the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North
America" may sound
good, but it actually undermines both security and prosperity for ordinary
citizens. Wondering why their elected leaders ignore their pleas, many face
rising lawlessness, unthinkable litter, lost jobs, and continual fear of
violence.[10]
The reasons are simple. International regulations have already bound
nations around the world to regional as well as global laws and policies. To
understand their aims, let's look at the United Nation's Report of the Global Commission on
International Migration [GCIM]. Chapter 6 warns us that "international
migration is a complex phenomenon," and most states (nations) "recognize the
importance of international migration and seek to address it in a way that
enables them to respect their international obligations."[1]
What does that mean? Might the word "respect"
actually imply "obedience" to international guidelines? An illusion of national
sovereignty The subtle language in many UN documents hides the
assault on national sovereignty. While sounding affirmative, it undermines any
"sovereign" action that might oppose UN policies. The UN Declaration on Human
Rights illustrates this manipulative language well. Its
Article 18 upholds "the right to freedom of thought, conscience and
religion..." Article 19 affirms "the right to freedom of opinion and
expression...." But Article 29 states that "these rights and
freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles
of the United Nations." In other words, its promise of "human rights" does
not apply to those who would criticize the UN or its policies. Nor does it
apply to Christians who cling to God's "offensive" truths -- or refuse to
follow UNESCO's Declaration
on the Role of Religion. The migration issue shifts national sovereignty onto the same slippery ground. In the numbered items below, notice the GCIM's promising assurance -- followed by a clear denial of traditional sovereignty:
The following points show some of the ways nations must cooperate with regional and global policies:
Regional integration Regional integration, such as the European Union (EU), was planned long ago as a stepping stone toward global governance. Since the regulations for regionalism are established at the UN level, this initial merger of nations -- such as Canada, United States and Mexico -- redefines sovereignty and submits everyone to international controls. Ashley Mote, an independent member of the European Parliament, explains how this revolutionary system would swallow up any representative form of government:
Today's euphemistic propaganda for regional governance continues to mislead the public. These statements by GCIM show only the positive side of the issue:
In Parts 2 and 3, we will look more closely at how the beliefs, cultural values, poverty and lawlessness inherent to the migration crisis create a public mindset that welcomes other UN goals: universal surveillance, universal data tracking, a new kind of "human settlement," and collective participation in the dialectic process. With the Canadian, anti-Christian UN leader, Maurice Strong, as one of the guiding lights behind this revolution, my biggest concern might be the UN "laws" that ban Biblical outreach to this new "mission field" in our midst. Meanwhile, study this chart [www.crossroad.to/charts/paradigm_shift.html] and remember God's promise to His people:"...in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."Romans 8:37-39 Part 2: The emerging New World Order Endnotes: 1. Report of the Global Commission on International Migration, CHAPTER SIX: Creating coherence: The governance of international migration , www.gcim.org/attachements/GCIM%20Report%20Chapter%20Six.pdf 2. Phyllis Schlafly President defies most Republicans on immigration, 5-29-06, www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/phyllisschlafly/2006/05/29/199084.html3. "The Revolutionary Roots of the UN at www.crossroad.to/Excerpts/chronologies/un.htm 4. UN Charter at http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/. See also "Declaration on Tolerance" at www.crossroad.to/Quotes/globalism/Tolerance.htm 5. "Migration in an interconnected world: New directions for action, The Global Commission on International Migration at www.gcim.org/en/ 6. Thomas Sowell, 5-25-06, Bordering on fraud, part III, www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/thomassowell/2006/05/25/198692.html7. "1 million sex crimes by illegals," 5-31-06, http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50441 8. "100 Million More Immigrants in 20 Years?" 5-16-06, www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/5/15/165712.shtml?s=et 9/11, the Pentagon, and our borders, www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/michellemalkin/2006/05/17/197670.html 10. Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America, www.spp.gov. 11. www.crossroad.to/Quotes/globalism/declaration-on-religion.htm and www.crossroad.to/text/articles/turfur12-98.html12. MALDEF at www.maldef.org/legal/index.htm
and "Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) at www.discoverthenetwork.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=6156.
The latter describes it as: "The most influential Hispanic advocacy group in
the United States. 13. Ashley Mote MEP, "Beware the Secret Heart of the EU," www.ashleymote.co.uk/news.php?subaction=showfull&id=1122378641&archive=&start_from=&ucat=3&TB=home2 Original article: Crossroad  BACK
|
